REU 2000 Topics

REU 2000 Topics


This summer's topic were invariant theory of homogeneous polynomials (forms) and algebraic invariants of knots and links.

Invariant Theory

Invariant Theory Classical and Modern

Invariant theory is a subject that relates to many area of mathematics - Algebraic Geometry, Algebraic Topology, Combinatorics, Differential Equations and Representation Theory, to name five. In the nineteenth century several methods were developed to generate invariants, and general properties, such as Gordon's and Hilbert's finiteness results, were discovered and understood. However, the subject more or less died out, in part because of the complexity of the computations involved in this subject. In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in Invariant Theory. This stems from two reasons: (1) Modern computers have made feasiible many computation that could only be dreamed of at the turn of this century. (2) New applications have been found for Invariant Theory, ranging form Mumford's construction of moduli spaces, symmetry groups of differential equations to computer vision. We will begin with an exposition of the main algorithms for generating invariants. From here, there are many avenues to explore. One is simply to try to extend some of the calculations to other cases. For instance, the complete invariant system for binary septic was worked out by Dixmier and Lazard only about a decade ago; the binary octic was done a little earlier by Shioda. But the complete invariant system for binary nonics is not worked out. One can also consider ternary or quaternary forms. For ternary forms, Clebsch and Gordon determined the covariants for the ternary cubic. This is important for the theory of elliptic curves, since each of these is represented as the zero - locus of such a form. Only recently was the ternary quartic understood, by Dixmier (the corresponding curves now have genus 3, so this is, in effect, a description of the moduli space of genus 3 curves.) For quaternary forms, the geometric objects are projective algebraic surfaces. The other directions to pursue are in the applications of invariant theory. This is very open - ended, and could depend on the interests of the students. A student interested in this ought to take a look at the just - published book by Peter Olver, ``Classical Invariant Theory'', London Math. Soc. Student Texts, number 44. In the extensive bibliography of this book are references ranging over a very wide domain, which could provide material for N REU programs, where N is a very large number.

Algebraic Invariants of Knots and Links

The area of classical knot and link theory is attractive to many undergraduates, but it requires limitation in scope as well as substantial simplification in the introductory development in order to be accessible. Our REU has chosen research directions t hat take off from linear algebra, elementary group theory and combinatorics. For example, the algebraic invariants for knots, links and braids, as traditionally developed, require a substantial amount of point-set and algebraic topology (including homolo gygroups). While this background is important for a thorough development, a equivalent approach to knots developed by Reidemeister considers equivalence classes of graphs under the Reidemeister moves and (isotopy classes) of planar embeddings. As an example, the projects for the Summer of 1999 was to investigate certain matrix representations of the braid group and develop geometric interpretations applicable to knots and links. Professor Stoltzfus developed an elementary approach to the Gassn er representation (as well as others related to the lower central series) using two additional, little studied, ingredients: twisting of the matrix multiplication and invariance of the ``representation" under a sesqui-linear form. The problems for the REU are algebraic, with heuristic allusions to their geometric interpretations. The interplay of algebra and geometry in this setting, as always, is a powerful tool. An important open question (despite recent purported attempts at proof) is whether the Gassner representation is injective or not. An approach was developed that is accessible to undergraduates having taken only a first course in abstract algebra.
REU Page
Last Update: 23 January, 2004